Sep 28, 2017

Weekend Links - 9/28/17

QUOTE OF THE DAY

In other words, to disagree well you must first understand well. You have to read deeply, listen carefully, watch closely. You need to grant your adversary moral respect; give him the intellectual benefit of doubt; have sympathy for his motives and participate empathically with his line of reasoning. And you need to allow for the possibility that you might yet be persuaded of what he has to say. Bret Stephens 


GRAPHIC OF THE DAY



RETIREMENT FINANCE AND PLANNING

Both the level and the sequence of investment returns will have a big impact on retirement outcomes. Poor returns during the early years of retirement are bad news. However, the particular withdrawal strategy used affects sequence risk, and an approach where withdrawals are variable and respond to portfolio performance can improve retirement outcomes. I’ll examine the evidence and then use my own modeling to show how a strategy that combines variable withdrawals with partial annuitization using a single-premium immediate annuity (SPIA) maximizes the cash available for consumption. 

In this paper we propose a multi-objective decision framework for lifecycle investment choice. Instead of optimizing individual strategies with respect to a single-valued objective, we suggest evaluation of classes of strategies in terms of the quality of the tradeoffs that they provide. The proposed framework takes inspiration from psychological theories which, on the one hand, assert that humans analyze risky choice situations in terms of several competing factors, and, on the other hand, recognize that attribute overload is detrimental to decision making. In particular, we use SP/A (security-potential/aspiration) theory as developed by Lopes and co-authors. The proposed approach is illustrated in a simple lifecycle model. As decision factors, we consider (a) the contribution paid, (b) the ambition level (targeted level of retirement income), and (c) the guarantee level (a level of retirement income that will be achieved with high probability). In terms of the tradeoffs generated between these indices, we compare a class of traditional lifecycle strategies, defined in terms of a glide path, with a class of so called collar strategies.  

An investor who either buys an income annuity at retirement, or who has a higher level of guaranteed income through a pension or Social Security, should hold a different asset allocation than an investor who holds little guaranteed income. We use current annuity and bond prices to estimate optimal equity allocation for retirees with varying levels of guaranteed income who have higher and lower preference for income stability and bequests. We find that increasing annuitized income has a strong impact on optimal equity allocation. The average retiree will see their optimal equity allocation increase by roughly one percentage point for each percentage point increase in annuitized total wealth. Our results provide insight into prudent asset allocation recommendations for clients who haver higher levels of annuitized income. [emphasis added] 

Framing Longevity Income, Guillemette et al. Texas Tech
This paper analyzes the effect of framing on the stated demand for longevity income products. We test whether longevity income framed as “insurance” is more attractive than longevity income framed as an “annuity,” since pure life longevity income is consumption protection. In a sample of 1,425 respondents, we find that when longevity “insurance” is shown before a longevity “annuity” that respondents are less likely to state a demand for a longevity “annuity.” In addition, we identify characteristics of respondents who are more likely to succumb to longevity annuity framing effects. Implications for financial planners and annuity providers are discussed. 

Identity Thieves Are Trying to Loot Annuities, thinkadvisor 

Overall, our analysis suggested that retirement withdrawal rates that were once safe may now deliver success rates that are no better – or even worse – than a coin flip…[but] When a tactical strategy is combined with other incremental planning and portfolio improvements, such as prudent diversification, more accurate spending assessments, tax efficient asset location, and fee-conscious investing, a modest allocation can greatly boost likely retirement success and comfort.  

this research explores how spending and relationship quality contribute to life satisfaction in retirement, controlling for financial and human capital factors. The results provide evidence to suggest that leisure spending, health status, and spousal and friend relationships have the greatest impact on creating life satisfaction during retirement, while other type of spending and children relationships do not. 

MARKETS AND INVESTING


I’ve come to realize that investing may be the ultimate case of FOMO. Spending all your money on useless things doesn’t even come close. Let me explain why in three reasons. 

MPT is a tool in an adviser’s toolbox — one they can choose to use or not. Behavioral finance and MPT are not at odds with each other or mutually exclusive. In fact, they work well together. Investment paradigms benefit from the mosaic of research and ideas that continue to advance our field.   

Cognitive bias cheat sheet, betterhumans.coach.me
Every cognitive bias is there for a reason — primarily to save our brains time or energy. If you look at them by the problem they’re trying to solve, it becomes a lot easier to understand why they exist, how they’re useful, and the trade-offs (and resulting mental errors) that they introduce. 

ALTERNATIVE RISK

What we don't internalize is confidence.  We're never on the front foot when taking risk because we've programmed ourselves to expect shortcoming. 

All asset pricing models, by definition, are flawed or wrong. If such models were perfectly correct, they would be laws (such as the laws we have in physics). But that doesn’t mean asset pricing models don’t provide value. As Fama and French note in their conclusion: “Complete success is almost certainly impossible, but less-than-perfect models can provide useful descriptions of expected returns.” 

Riding the wave,  aima.org
The paper opens with an overview of the commodity trading advisor (CTA) sector, highlighting the significant growth that has taken place in the managed futures industry in recent years and explaining how the managed futures strategies that CTAs employ work in practice. The breadth of sub-strategies under the managed futures umbrella are then examined. The third part of the paper examines the benefits and perceived risks to investors of allocating to managed futures strategies and also addresses various common misunderstandings about CTAs. The paper concludes by exploring the common ways as to how investors can access the various investment strategies that are available.

We are all quants now, abnormalreturns
“Program, program, program, program.” 

SOCIETY AND CAPITAL

“You can make the argument that we are living in Peak Asshole,” says Robert Sutton, a Stanford professor who, as the author of the iconic 2007 book The No Asshole Rule, is perhaps the world’s leading expert on the species. According to Sutton, the problem of “disrespectful, demeaning, and downright mean-spirited behavior” is “worse than ever,” which, while it may be bad news for humanity, is good news for The Asshole Survival Guide, the book Sutton came to New York to promote. 

The second report, published in 1969, argued that universities and colleges should aggressively pursue risk in the quest to increase their endowments. Its principal author, John Barker, an academic and member of Smith College’s Investment Committee, compiled data on the performance of 15 elite university and college endowments and found them lacking. It predicted that a continuation of outmoded investing strategies would have “highly adverse consequences for long-term endowment values.” 

That being said ESG isn’t all about performance. In fact, those investors who say you can definitely have your ESG (cake) and eat it (returns) too are likely overstating the case. Cliff Asness at AQR thinks ESG investors should be willing (and have to) sacrifice returns in order to follow their conscience.  

In the real world, no one has full and complete information about economic interactions. But is that an argument for or against free markets? For or against government regulation? The answer seems to be "all of the above." 

This paper examines inequality in end-of-life wealth and the factors that contribute to individuals reaching this life stage with few financial resources. It analyzes repeated cross-sections of the Health and Retirement Study, as well as a small longitudinal sample of individuals observed both at age 65 and shortly before death. Most of those who die with little wealth had little wealth at retirement. There is strong persistence over time in the bottom tail of the wealth distribution, but the probability of having low wealth increases slowly with age after age 65. Those with low lifetime earnings are much more likely to report low wealth at retirement, and to die with little wealth, than their higher-earning contemporaries. The onset of a major medical condition and the loss of a spouse increase in the probability of falling into the low wealth category at advanced ages, although these factors appear to contribute to wealth decline for only a small fraction of those who had modest wealth at age 65 but low wealth at the time of death.  

New jobs are clustered in the economy's best-off places, leaving one of every four new jobs for the bottom 60% of zip codes. 

Our paper shows why model selection might not be such a bad idea after all. The basic problem with averaging is that it forces models to compete. Competition is great when the rules are fixed and fair. But here, the time-varying parameter model can effectively alter the rules of the game in its own favor. 

it's broadly true that those who are older or who have better education levels also tend to have higher net worth. However, mean net worth does tend to diminish just a bit for the older age groups, which makes some sense if that group is consuming wealth and passing it wealth to younger groups. The bottom half or so of the American population has relatively little in net worth, but it's not obvious from this table how big a problem that is. After all, one would expect most people in their 20s to have little net worth, and even people in their 30s who potentially have big home mortgages and high student debts might not have high net worth. The more troublesome groups, which are not the focus of this overview report, would be those in their 40s who are not yet taking real steps to accumulating wealth, or those in their 50s and 60s who are approaching retirement but have not yet accumulated much wealth. 


No comments:

Post a Comment