Let's say that mean life expectancy can be extracted from a mortality table like this (keeping in mind I am always insecure about notation; I am an amateur):
where E[L(x)] is some kind of mean cohort longevity expectation at age x when d is set to 0, w is something like max age = 121 but could also kinda be infinity, x is one's age at examination of the idea of some longevity proposition, and tPx is a conditional survival probability at time t for someone age x.
Then further, let's say that the cost of procrastination can be defined in unit terms as 1 year of remaining L at any x. I'll leave the continuous stuff to the wonks and eggheads. That means that the cost of procrastination at age x might be defined as:
c(x) = 1/E[L(x)]
When we play this game using a mortality table like the SOA IAM table, it would look like this:
Which would make c(x) = 3.9% of remaining lifetime at 60. That's bad enough (and even worse if using a Soc Security life table and worse still if we used some subjective threshold for future cognitive/mobility declines), especially if I compared it to me at age 25, but the calculus is implacable because over the entire interval of interest, no matter how you slice it:
c' > 0, and, more importantly...
c'' > 0
Conclusion?
The cost of procrastination is damn expensive and getting moreso by the day.
------------------------------
post script
Here is a second curve in red for when a fixed age 85 is used as a subjective threshold in evaluating the cost of procrastination. But 85 is the new 82, right?
post script
Here is a second curve in red for when a fixed age 85 is used as a subjective threshold in evaluating the cost of procrastination. But 85 is the new 82, right?
No comments:
Post a Comment