Apr 24, 2018

RH Links - 4/24/2018

QUOTE OF THE DAY

Monte Carlo simulation of a flawed strategy for an individual household’s retirement plan is pointless. DirkCotton [emphasis added]



GRAPHIC OF THE DAY


RETIREMENT FINANCE AND PLANNING

No decision is without trade-offs. Having one spouse working when the other leaves their career creates new challenges at the same time it solves others. Retiring before my wife produces new relationship stress, limits financial and personal options that would be available if we were both retired, and creates unique risks. There are major personal and financial implications for partners retiring at different times. They need to be considered to determine if this strategy makes sense for you. 

One of the core tenets of our money management philosophy is to talk about concentrated investments in terms of regret minimization. When we speak with the employees of companies like Amazon or Google who reach out to us, our job is to frame the issue in terms of what would hurt you more, both emotionally and financially – diversifying away from the company’s stock and watching it soar, or holding on through a company-specific catastrophe. Presenting the pros and cons this way allows for our client to think in terms of two different realities that may or may not occur. We often make a break-through with this technique, but not always.  

Advisors providing retirement recommendations need to evaluate strategies and present options to clients. Communication is key and it can be a challenge to come up with the best way to compare alternatives. One way involves presenting metrics such as expected bequests and plan failure probabilities. However, it may be more helpful to use a graphical approach to show the year-by-year progression of funds available during retirement. I’ll demonstrate a graphical approach by comparing a variety of strategies. 


But in my opinion the passive Swensen portfolio competes quite well with the active Yale Endowment, and I think there are some important lessons here for normal investors like you and me… while Yale has a point that portfolio design can improve risk-adjusted returns, they overstate how much of that effect is attributable to active management rather than simple intelligent asset allocation…I personally think the right path is to reap the best of both worlds by learning strategy from the endowments while applying that strategy with low-cost and low-maintenance index funds.  With the tools available to investors today, you have a lot more power than you realize. [good analytical cover…worth the read] 

One of the biggest problems with traditional safe withdrawal rates is that it’s really difficult to know in real-time (without the benefit of hindsight) when a significant drop in your portfolio value is normal or if it indicates that the plan is fundamentally broken. … Perpetual withdrawal rates designed to maintain principal serve as effective guideposts along the retirement journey to reassure that you’re on the right path.  I would argue that this last point is especially important for early retirees, as remaining grounded in the real-world will ultimately make any plan much easier to sustain for an investing lifetime than relying on faith in a retirement study looking only at distant endpoints and very long term averages to come to your rescue. 

If tontines did exist, they would likely make the most sense as part of a larger portfolio that also includes some liquid wealth and annuities. 

Tontines’ big advantage is their guaranteed payouts to each investor. But a tontine costs less than annuities, because its investors – rather than an insurance company – bear the risk. A modified tontine for retirees would address their current downside: very old people get the largest payoffs, by default, as others in the pool die, but age and poor health can prevent some from fully enjoying the money. The modified retirement tontine could make equal, regular payments to all the participants over the years – rather than give the biggest payouts to those who live the longest – Wettstein said. 

[some simple and predictable thoughts…] 




There is a common belief in many FIRE circles that if one’s Safe Withdrawal Rate actually runs into problems — maybe 3.5% isn’t safe because of a Japan-style recession or maybe one’s personal expenses rise faster than CPI — the smart, hard-working, savvy person who was able to get to FIRE will be able to land another job that gets them back in the workforce to make up that shortfall. This 2013 article in the New York Times is a good antidote to that kind of thinking…It certainly isn’t a slam-dunk that any transition back to work will be easy. 

MARKETS AND INVESTING


The difference between the 10-year and 2-year Treasury rates narrowed to 47 44 basis points on Monday (April 16) – the smallest gap since late-2007. The last time this widely followed spread was this close to zero the US economy was close to a recession. Is this indicator flashing a similar warning today? No, according to a broad reading of the economic data, which reflects a healthy trend. The question is whether the narrowing yield spread is still a reliable late-cycle warning that the macro profile will weaken in the months ahead? [good thing I bought those curve steepener bonds] 

bond yields can’t be compared to dividend yields on an absolute basis. Dividends offer the potential for long-term growth in income payments, but looking at dividends alone doesn’t tell the entire story for stock market yields. You also have to consider share repurchases and debt repayments by corporations, both of which make stock market yields look more attractive when seen through the lens of a shareholder yield approach. 

This paper highlights that within the bond market, it was possible in the past for an investor to “reach for safety” and generate higher returns than the market bond portfolio (at least on paper). Since investors have a preference for yield, they may push up the prices of higher-yielding securities which thereby reduces future returns. A simple screen proposes to eliminate the bottom quintile of bonds on either Quality, Value, or Both. By doing so, and purchasing the market-weighted portfolio of remaining bonds, the paper finds a higher return and Sharpe ratio compared to the market portfolio, before transaction costs.  

we should also ask the question about what happens to future yield changes if there is a yield curve inversion. For the period November 1976 to April 2018, we compared the 10-year/2-year constant maturity speed against the change in 10-year yields over the future six months. Only 14.5% of the time period shows negative spreads. 

After-tax performance reporting is critical for taxable investors but is unfortunately often overlooked due, in part, to its complexity and lack of offerings in the space. Instead, most performance reporting models available today provide only pre-tax reporting, ignoring the after-tax aspects so relevant for taxable investors. In this paper, we seek to resolve this issue by proposing an effective and workable after-tax performance report aimed at enhancing wealth preservation and accumulation for taxable investors. We also outline and offer justification for the various choices that we make in our report in the hope that others will adopt our proposed solution, but also review, comment, and improve on it.  

The correlation risk premium is a premium for uncertainty of future correlation of securities among each other or with a benchmark. A rise in correlation reduces diversification benefits. The common adage that in a crash ‘all correlations go to one’ reflects that there is typically not much diversification in large market downturns and systemic crises, except through outright shorts. Correlation risk premia can be estimated based on option prices and their implied correlation across stocks. There is evidence that these estimates are useful predictors for long-term individual stock performance, over and above the predictive power of variance risk premia. 


ALTERNATIVE RISK


While investors are often concerned about catastrophic risks, failing to allocate enough to risky assets can lead investors to “fail slowly” by not maintaining pace with inflation or supporting withdrawal rates… Despite reducing upside capture, trend following strategies may represent a beneficial diversifier for conservative portfolios going forward, potentially allowing investors to more fully participate with equity market growth without necessarily fully exposing themselves to equity market risk.   

As the chart below shows, trend-following outperformance has occurred at a much higher rate than a coin flip and that beat rate has increased over longer periods. This specific 12-month trend model outperformed a 60/40 portfolio over ~80% of rolling 60-month time frames since 1926 and 90%+ of the time over 10 and 15 year periods. … In other words, if trend following is your base allocation, would you as an investor allocate to a different strategy that underperformed at a 70%+ rate over 3-5 year rolling time frames and 90-100% of rolling 10-15 year time frames, and had materially more downside risk? Not only would I not make that allocation, I'd love to bet someone with proceeds going to charity that trend following would outperform.   


SOCIETY AND CAPITAL


Are governments making promises about pensions that they might not be able to keep?
According to an analysis by the World Economic Forum (WEF), there was a combined retirement savings gap in excess of $70 trillion in 2015, spread between eight major economies.. The WEF says the deficit is growing by $28 billion every 24 hours – and if nothing is done to slow the growth rate, the deficit will reach $400 trillion by 2050, or about five times the size of the global economy today.  

It's important to distinguish between actuarial problems (the present value of projected future benefit payments exceeds the funds set aside to pay them plus projected future contributions) and cash problems (not having the money to send out this month's checks). Actuarial problems are always debatable and usually involve the distant future. Cash shortfalls are undeniable and immediate. 

“Well, Chicago is not an articulate town, Saul Bellow notwithstanding. Maybe it’s because so many of us aren’t that far removed from parents and grandparents who knew only bits and pieces of the language.” The classic Chicago accent is heard less often these days because the white working class is less numerous, and less influential, than it was in the 20th century. It has been pushed to the margins of city life, both figuratively and geographically, by white flight, multiculturalism and globalization: The accent is most prevalent in blue-collar suburbs and predominantly white neighborhoods in the northwest and southwest corners of the city, now heavily populated by city workers whose families have lived in Chicago for generations.  

the United States is also the sum of its parts. America represents the union of 50 states and other jurisdictions such as D.C., and all of these state-level economies have their own unique problems to overcome, drivers of growth, and local resources that factor into their prosperity.  

Gigerenzer makes a convincing argument that heuristics work better (greater accuracy and faster decision-making) when decisions involve a high-degree of uncertainty…. Say you invested in 50 funds. How many years of stock data would be needed before the mean variance method finally does better than 1/N? A computer simulation provides the answer: About 500 years!... Heuristics recognise that the future is uncertain. They deliberately give up on trying to find an optimal solution and instead focus on trying to find a reasonable, common-sense alternative. Turns out that they aren’t really losing much as the optimal solution is effectively unknowable. 


But here’s a situation that might be a bit more peculiar. One would guess that with student debt being at $1.5 trillion in the United States, many Millennials would opt to pay down debt with their $10,000 check. Interestingly, fewer Millennials (22.4%) chose to pay down debt than either Gen X (25.3%) or Boomers (33.1%). On the same token, Millennials were more likely to choose either real estate (15.1%) or cryptocurrency (9.2%) as an investment. For contrast, look at Boomers, a group that had 11.2% choose real estate and only 3.1% choose crypto. 

Reversable decisions are not an excuse to act reckless or be ill-informed, but is rather a belief that we should adapt the frameworks of our decisions to the types of decisions we are making. Reversible decisions don’t need to be made the same way as irreversible decisions. … Once you understand that reversible decisions are in fact reversible you can start to see them as opportunities to increase the pace of your learning.  

"Moreover, this weakness implies that discrimination in the labour market is measured at only one point of an individual’s career, i.e. his/her access to a job interview. It says nothing however about his/her likelihood of being hired, or paid equally and promoted once hired. Nevertheless, audit studies indicate that, conditional on being interviewed, individuals from the minority (i.e. the group that typically receives the lowest rate of invitation to a job interview) are also less likely to be hired (e.g. Cédiey and Foroni (2008)). These findings suggest that correspondence studies underestimate hiring discrimination." 

Think the rural heartland is the struggling core of modern America? Actually, America’s middle has been outperforming the coasts for decades. And while Trump’s ascendance has shined a spotlight on the plight of white men left behind by a changing economy, they still enjoy vast advantages over blue-collar black and female workers. … If you gather all of rural America into one homogeneous blob, the story looks bleak indeed, with the population shrinking as job growth lags. But this rural vs. the rest approach muddies the picture more than it reveals — because the experiences of rural areas vary widely across the country. In particular, counties in the Plains states and the resource-rich middle of the country have enjoyed some of the largest per capita income gains in the entire country. And that includes lots of thinly populated spaces that easily fit the definition of rural. 

Research conducted by Francine Blau, a professor of economics at Cornell, suggests that this division between which jobs and industries men and women tend to work in — called sex segregation — is now the single biggest factor explaining the pay gap between men and women. 

If you automate first, you get automated errors. [and] The ultimate conclusion of that survey is stark: “59% of last year’s crowdsales are either confirmed failures or failures-in-the-making.” 

These findings suggest that previous unilateral tariff increases have reduced economic activity. 






No comments:

Post a Comment