Nov 16, 2017

Weekend Links - 11/16/17

QUOTE OF THE WEEK

In high school, I was a nerd and a loner.  Harry Markowitz in 2016 interview.


GRAPHIC OF THE WEEK



RETIREMENT FINANCE AND PLANNING

Despite the fact that a lump sum is a losing mathematical proposition, people will still consider taking the lump sum for any number of reasons based on their personal situation. Those reasons may range from pure want to true need. In some rare cases where inflation plays a role, the math may even make sense. Other pensioners may simply not realize a lump sum comes at a discount (for the pension fund)  

The present paper considers a retiree of a certain age with an initial endowment of investable wealth facing the following alternative investment opportunities. One possibility is to buy a single premium immediate annuity-contract. This insurance contract pays a life-long constant pension payment of a certain amount, depending e.g. on the age of the retiree, the operating cost of the insurance company and the return the company is able to realize from its investments. The alternative possibility is to invest the single premium into a portfolio of mutual funds and to periodically withdraw a fixed amount, in the present paper chosen to be equivalent to the consumption stream generated by the annuity . The particular advantage of this self annuitization strategy compared to the life annuity is its greater liquidity. However, the risk of the second opportunity is to outlive the income stream generated by this investment. The risk in this sense is specified by considering the probability of running out of money before the uncertain date of death. The determination of this personal ruin probability with respect to German mortality and capital market conditions is the objective of the following paper. 

Annuity Valuation, Long-term Care, and Bequest Motives, John Ameriks, Andrew Caplin, Steven Laufer, and Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh Pension Research Council Working Paper [2007]
Financial security in retirement has traditionally meant having a steady flow of annuity income as long as one lives, a definition enshrined in the Social Security system. Our earlier research has stressed a more holistic approach, which focuses on the match between resources and spending needs. This formulation enables us to estimate annuity values given long term care concerns and bequest motives, where these estimated values are consistent with low observed demand for standard annuities. This chapter uses this model to value non-standard annuities with various security-enhancing features that we believe may be of value to retirees. 

Rational Decumulation, Babbel & Merrill
In particular, high levels of annuitization are shown to be rational under a wide range of risk aversion levels, even when stock market returns and annuity price loadings are assumed to be much greater than is generally the case. Ours is also the first study to model individual behavior under the possibility of default by the insurer issuing annuities. We find that even a little default risk can have a very large impact on annuity purchase decisions.  

Measures of Retirement Benefit Adequacy - Society of Actuaries 2013, Bajtelsmit
This report focuses on measuring retirement benefit adequacy in light of both expected and unexpected expenses in retirement and linking the measurement to the needs and objectives of different stakeholder groups. The report begins with a conceptual discussion of benefit adequacy and the various ways it has been and can be measured. Adequacy measures examined include replacement ratios, projected expenditures, and minimum societal standards. Both income needs and lump sum equivalents are considered. Different measures are better suited to the needs of different stakeholders and at different life stages.  

Personal finance health by whitecoatinvestor.com
Get married and stay that way. One house. One job. One spouse.
Have a high salary
Career longevity
Insure against catastrophe
Live well below your means
Don’t sell low
Buy and hold reasonable portfolio
Be uncomfortable with debt
Limit educational costs
Pursue inexpensive hobbies

How to Spend Less, peterlazaroff.com
For starters, let’s redefine what we’re talking about. Forget calling this ‘Saving.’ From now on this is called ‘Prioritizing.’  

Fixed Living costs. Humbledollar
Why are fixed living costs so important? There are five reasons. 

When it comes to distributing a portfolio, there are specific factors to pay attention to. Here are a few suggestions to put a little evidence-based thinking into your clients’ retirement plans.  

There’s nothing new about these types of claims. You hear them all the time from active managers. But do they contain any real truths?  To investigate that question, I’ll offer a different perspective on these assertions, and provide the appropriate historical evidence, so you can draw your own 

Using numerical optimization techniques, we show that this product would provide a substantial proportion of the longevity insurance provided by an immediate annuity, at a small fraction of the cost. At plausible levels of actuarial unfairness, households should prefer it to both immediate and postponed annuitization, and an optimal decumulation of unannuitized wealth. We show that few households would suffer significant losses were it used as a 401(k) plan default.

The cost of health care, particularly for those on Medicare, is a prime example of a financial planning assumption that gets a lot of new research. This research causes us to evaluate whether our current estimates are ones with which we are still comfortable. With that in mind, I'd like to review our current assumption for health care costs in retirement, consider recent research, and evaluate whether we need to adjust. 

Results from this analysis suggest that optimal initial safe withdrawal rates varied significantly when guaranteed income was considered, from approximately 6 percent when 95 percent of wealth was in guaranteed income, versus approximately 2 percent when only 5 percent of wealth was in guaranteed income. Safe initial withdrawal rates also varied when using dynamic withdrawal strategies and forward-looking investment return projections, but the impact was more muted (less than 1 percentage point). 


MARKETS AND INVESTING

Low volatility is a variation on the prosperity argument used by Minksy to start the cycle of speculative excess. Low volatility lulls investors into thinking risk is actually lower than reality just like prosperity or no economic downturn will cause bankers to change lending practices. Because perceived risk is lower, there is a willingness to increase leverage and increase investment in riskier assets. Risky assets are bid higher which are then used as collateral for further leverage. This volatility argument is separate from the reach for yield because of low interest rates. Risk-taking on low volatility makes the financial system more fragile.  

Asset allocation is one of the most important decisions faced by investors, however there are no universally accepted criteria that define exactly what an asset class is.  

If markets are unable do the heavy lifting for a portfolio, investors are going to have to pick up the slack elsewhere and learn to behave enough to earn their fair share of market returns. Lower market returns likely mean people should save more, make more, work longer, spend less or adjust their lifestyle in retirement. 

Investors following a purely quantitative approach to asset allocation are often left with unintuitive portfolios with high turnover. On the other hand, those who pursue ad-hoc approaches face uncertainty about the portfolio’s risk level and the suitability of the allocation to reach specific goals.   

The history of bubbles and crashes in markets is well documented, but rarely is there agreement about bubbles until after they burst. With this simple formula, bubbles can be mathematically identified and categorized BEFORE they burst. In addition, options traders should consider this formula in their pricing algorithms, otherwise, the out-of-the-money puts will likely be mispriced.  

In the case of U.S. versus International, not only do we not expect the two baskets to share similar characteristics, but the construction of the trade ensures it.  This is important because both sides are now exposed to different risk factors that can cause the trade to go off-course.  For example, higher relative economic growth in the U.S. may help neutralize a higher relative valuation.  Introducing a variety of unintended risk factors means a diluted trade.  

The Risk Of Estimating Risk, capitalspectator
Ultimately, the rationale for practicing some risk-management analysis is bound up with the empirical fact that market history repeats, albeit without a pre-determined time table. High-priced assets beget low and negative returns, and vice versa… eventually. Accordingly, prudent investors make reasonable rebalancing decisions based on a clear-eyed view of risk through time. It could be different this time, of course. But betting the farm on the notion that risk is no longer relevant isn’t investing or even speculation – it’s hallucinating. 

Based on our empirical tests and existing research, we estimate that the “average” investor is likely to benefit significantly from working with a financial advisor, so long as the advisor provides comprehensive, high-quality portfolio services for a reasonable fee. The potential benefits associated with making better portfolio decisions will vary considerably by investor. 



ALTERNATIVE RISK
  
The numbers suggest that being short volatility gave you a positive premium in a stable world, but when the world is less stable, (higher realized volatility), you do not want to be a vol seller. The chart suggests that there can still be a positive risk premium when realized volatility is high, but the odds work against you. It is a way to get to a realized volatility of more than 20% at current levels, but that world can become a reality quickly if there is an equity sell-off. 


SOCIETY AND CAPITAL

If you think if Medicare and Medicaid as examples of "single payer" health insurance plan, you are at best partially correct. 

- Spacetime, not space and time
- we all travel in spacetime at a single speed "c"
- no more speed to gain 

Portfolios of the Rich, Carroll, NBER [2000]
This paper documents another large difference between the rich and the rest of the population: portfolios of the rich are heavily skewed toward risky assets, particularly investments in their own privately held businesses. The paper explores three possible explanations of these facts.  

"There has been more convergence between poor people in poor countries and rich people in rich countries over the last generation than in any generation in human history. The dramatic way to say it is that between the time of Pericles and London in 1800, standards of living rose about 75 percent in 2,300 years. They called it the Industrial Revolution because for the first time in human history, standards of living were visibly and 2 meaningfully different at the end of a human lifespan than they had been at the beginning of a human lifespan, perhaps 50 percent higher during the Industrial Revolution. Fifty percent is the growth that has been achieved in a variety of six-year periods in China over the last generation and in many other countries, as well. And so if you look at material standards of living, we have seen more progress for more people and more catching up than ever before. That is not simply about things that are material and things that are reflected in GDP. ... [I]f current trends continue, with significant effort from the global community, it is reasonable to hope that in 2035 the global child mortality rate will be lower than the US child mortality rate was when my children were born in 1990. That is a staggering human achievement. It is already the case that in large parts of China, life expectancy is greater than it is in large parts of the United States."  

As The Economist pointed out, “Measuring the economic impact of all the ways the internet has changed people’s lives is devilishly difficult because so much of it has no price.… This problem is an old one in economics. GDP measures monetary transactions, not welfare.”  



13D
In the wake of the Harvey Weinstein accusations, women all over the world are coming together in stunning numbers to name the men that have hurt or humiliated them for so long. Unlike high profile sexual harassment cases in the past — Anita Hill or Paula Jones come to mind — something feels different this time. Public outrage is deeper and more sustained. No doubt many powerful men across the professional spectrum are not sleeping well. As The New York Times wrote over the weekend: “Several experts likened it to a dam breaking, the cumulative effect of harassment claims over decades and especially the last few years…Maybe it’s reflective of a specific period in American history, in which working women of a new generation — those who had grown up with working mothers — decided that enough was enough.”  [even male retirement-finance bloggers could, theoretically, say #metoo but that is another story. Let's give this epochal change in the world to the women in our lives and world who can, should, and will lead the way]





No comments:

Post a Comment