Aug 11, 2017

Weekend Links - 8/11/2017


When you view the illiquidity of assets, like PE and VC, as a commitment device then they make a lot more sense. -- Tadas Viskanta 



RETIREMENT FINANCE AND PLANNING

Stress-test Your Financial Independence,  tenfactorialrocks.com
On one hand is a thrill of finally reaching financial independence or early retirement (FIRE).  A long cherished goal for many aspirants.   The 4% rule is a widely used standard to mark this accomplishment or if you wish to read up and become very conservative, you could use 3.27%, but who’s quibbling? On the other hand is a real worry you may outlive your portfolio.  The media fuels this fear constantly. It’s hard to remain unaffected. 

The main reason why I think more Americans aren’t doing financially better is due to a lack of education. Why aren’t personal finance fundamentals indoctrinated in kids by the 12th grade, I don’t know…To be between 56 – 61 and only have $163,577 in your retirement account means you are going to be living a spartan life once work stops. If you spend just $33,000 a year in retirement, your money will run out after five years. Hope must come from Social Security benefits to help them make it through the golden years. 

The researchers find a straight-line relationship between the percentage of people in a country who are working at age 60 to 64 and their performance on memory tests. The longer people in a country keep working, the better, as a group, they do on the tests when they are in their early 60s.  

[normally, I am not all that interested in insurance companies but it's worth keeping an eye on how one's potential counterparty views risk.  Interest rate and longevity risk shouldn't surprise, I guess.  Given that we have lived through a decade where the advantage has (except for the bull market) not been strictly in the retiree's favor, I'm hoping that will shift…soon) ]




MARKETS AND INVESTING

Don’t get your hopes up too high about continued double-digit equity returns over the next decade! …My personal equity return forecast is just under 4% in real terms and just under 6% nominal. That’s the rate of return I use for my own projections. It’s also one of the reasons I’m skeptical about the 4% Rule: How can you withdraw 4% every year if equities return less than that and bonds hardly return more than inflation? But just like every forecast, it’s subject to uncertainty. Under pretty reasonable ranges of estimates, we cover the entire range from 3.5% to 8%.  

In spite of several efforts by researchers to overcome the estimation-risk problem (the use of estimate inputs based on sample information as if they were representative of the true population) which produces the so-called “wacky weights”, DeMiguel, Garlappi and Uppal (2009) present striking evidence that favors a simple 1/N naıve portfolio strategy. 


ALTERNATIVE RISK

Negative (short) volatility premiums are widespread, statistically significant and economically meaningful. There was a consistently positive mean for the spread between implied and realized volatility in all asset classes and components…Selling volatility is profitable in virtually all markets nearly all the time, including the five-year period surrounding September 2008, with a consistently positive mean for volatility returns (but with fat left tails)… Taken together, these results indicate that buyers offer insurance-like economic rents to sellers, who earn a steady monthly income in exchange for bearing ‘crash’ risk—the possibility of severe but empirically infrequent losses.”

Tobias Moskowitz, Yao Hua Ooi and Lasse Pedersen, showed that times-series momentum exhibits low correlation with broad bond markets and near-zero correlation with broad stock markets over the sample period from January 1985 through February 2017. This means that the returns of a trend-following strategy are nearly independent of the returns of traditional stock and bond portfolios. But the time-series momentum factor also has diversification benefits beyond these simple correlations. The historical evidence demonstrates that time-series momentum also provides a good hedge against bear equity markets… "Annualized gross returns were 14.9 percent over the full period, with net returns (after fees) of 11.2 percent, higher than the return for equities but with about half the volatility (an annual standard deviation of 9.7 percent). Net returns were positive in every decade, with the lowest net return being the 5.7 percent return for the period beginning in 1910. There were also only five periods in which net returns were in the single digits. There was virtually no correlation to either stocks or bonds. Thus, the strategy provides strong diversification benefits while producing a high Sharpe ratio of 0.77. Even if future returns are not as strong, the diversification benefits would justify an allocation to the strategy." 

For computerized strategies that are supposed to be making people obsolete, quants are looking decidedly human in 2017. Program-driven hedge funds are stumbling, a promising startup has closed, and once-reliable styles are showing weakening returns. A handful of investment factors, the wiring of smart-beta funds, have gone dormant.  

“Hedge funds’ problems are increasing as passive investing popularity is growing. There are no longer many retail counterparties to profit from. All this talk about quantitative models is hogwash in my opinion. These models cannot provide alpha to the tune of billions of dollars; they are useful only to retail quant traders with small accounts.” 



SOCIETY AND CAPITAL

AI brings a unique set of risk challenges. If they are not well managed, we may create new and greater risks…it is unclear how some forms of advanced machine intelligence even work. We simply don’t understand how some machines solve problems with deep learning algorithms. Should something go wrong, we might not be able to define the problem a solution. 

My take is that this is more of an expectations crisis than a retirement crisis. Many people are simply going to have to work longer, live on less, ratchet down their expectations for retirement or some combination of the three.  

ROBOTS ARE COMING for our jobs—but not all of our jobs. They’re coming, in ever increasing numbers, for a certain kind of work. For farm and factory labor. For construction. For haulage. In other words, blue-collar jobs traditionally done by men. [catchy title but I was not impressed by the content] https://www.wired.com/story/men-will-lost-the-most-jobs-to-robots/

Why wouldn’t we just feel as rich or as poor as we actually are? How to Predict If a Borrower Will Pay You Back Answering This Question Can Help You Better Understand Your Money Habits For one thing, money can be an emotional topic, and our feelings about it are often synced to how we’re feeling more broadly. Anxious and pessimistic people may assess their financial situation too negatively, for example, while some people may be overly optimistic about their wealth due to fantasies of affluence. 

the more I’ve thought about it, the less promising the prospects seem—and the less surprised I am by the disappearance of great family fortunes. That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t try to help future generations. But our impact is likely to be limited and short-lived, for two reasons.  

When we instead use an extensive array of administrative income records linked to the same CPS ASEC sample, we find that median household income was $44,400 (30 percent higher) and the poverty rate was just 6.9 percent. We demonstrate that large differences between survey and administrative record estimates are present within most demographic subgroups and are not easily explained by survey design features or processes such as imputation. Further, we show that the discrepancy is mainly attributable to underreporting of retirement income from defined benefit pensions and retirement account withdrawals. 

Declining population growth and rising dependency ratios in the developed world have been one key factor behind the decline in nominal and real interest rates since the 1980s. Personal savings for retirement are growing, while investment spending is not rising commensurately, and long-term economic growth is dampened by slowing or even shrinking work forces. A new ECB paper suggests that for the euro area these trends will likely continue to compress interest rates for another 10 years, a challenge for monetary policy and financial stability. 

In a radio interview with WEKU, Kentucky Go. Matt Bevin suggested last week that instead of covering both tax reform and the state’s public pension system, the fall legislative session may only tackle pensions—leaving tax reform for another day.  

No comments:

Post a Comment