Jul 13, 2017

Weekend Links - 7/13/17

QUOTE OF THE WEEK

If attaining reliable lifetime income is the goal, let’s start with this: The DB pension
architecture is the best system yet devised for spreading the income from one’s
working life over one’s whole life. Laurence Siegel



CHART OF THE WEEK

This is an impressionistic riff on skewed risk by 
earlyretirementnow.com Explains why I avoid lotteries, 
extended warranties, and long options and also why
I short options instead.

RETIREMENT FINANCE AND PLANNING


The next asset section of the RIO Map™ framework is the diversified portfolio. The diversified portfolio can be used most effectively to meet lifestyle and legacy goals, which translate into the liabilities related to discretionary expenses and legacy. Here we review your investments as well as your views, attitudes, and knowledge about investing. 

you could still have a big problem, even if you have enough money saved in your retirement accounts….

[ok, for what it's worth he's only 9 months in so it reads like one those giddy articles that new parents write about their new babies in parenting mags. I'd much rather have his perspective after 9 years. I'm almost 9 years in, btw] 


The final component of your assets is your reserves. In building our retirement income frameworks, we identify how well-positioned you are to absorb any potential external shocks to your retirement income streams, and how well-planned your asset-transfer strategies are. The primary purpose of reserves is to maintain liquidity to meet contingencies in retirement…Another subtle point about the importance of reserves relates to longevity risk aversion. When relying on an investment portfolio to cover retirement expenses, people may spend less because they have a somewhat amorphous mental account in their mind about using assets. 

In this column, Dr. Milevsky cautions us to be suspicious about retirement plan strategies (such as those that may be developed using Monte Carlo modeling or safe withdrawal approaches) that appear to offer higher levels of spending at little or no perceived additional risk.

What Does Retirement Really Cost?  Moshe Milevsky 2011.  
So, time to take-up smoking, boozing and ditch the exercise bike? …  Assuming a more aggressive portfolio, in the hopes that you can move to the upper right-hand corner of the table — and hence require a smaller nest egg for retirement — is a mirage. You can’t tweak expected return (a.k.a. asset allocations) assumptions until you get the numbers that you like. …  In fact, this sort of thinking is precisely the mistake that got the pension fund industry (and many of their actuaries) into big trouble. …Here is my view. If you don’t like how big this number looks — and you want certainty — then save more, retire later and plan to spend less. Assuming or expecting or anticipating 6.5% or planning to age 90 (only) won’t solve a structural funding problem. Greece is a nice place to retire, but not a very good role model for how to manage retirement finances.  

The Returned, sexhealthmoneydeath.com
So I’ve returned to full time, paid employment. I’m still thinking about retirement, but my experience has put a different perspective on my plans. In fact, I’m thinking that maybe I should be planning to work in some way, shape or form until I’m either mentally or physically unable to do it! It’s likely that this will be part time (and it’s likely that I’ll want it to be part time too) so I need to make plans. That’s what I failed to do last time ‘round. I’d only planned the financial part of early retirement, not the rest of what to do with my time. Hopefully I won’t be repeating that mistake going forward!

As acronyms go, we could do worse. FIRE has connotations of danger and emergency, which is how some people see their working life (or their bank balance). But for me yoking the concept of financial independence together with retiring early is not ideal. I just don’t see them as uniquely wedded at the hip. Also, I suspect it causes confusion about goals, and even cultivates outrage from those dreaded ‘retirement police’ who get angry if a FIRE-ee earns a few bob on the side.  

The conventional wisdom says no. But that isn’t necessarily the case.

If attaining reliable lifetime income is the goal, let’s start with this: The DB pension architecture is the best system yet devised for spreading the income from one’s working life over one’s whole life. … Pension systems are not in crisis because they are structurally flawed, or because they have been looted by evildoers. The crisis comes from sponsors anchoring on periods of extraordinarily high returns to overpromise and underfund pension promises and then applying the ultra-low interest rates of this era of financial repression to those same pension promises. [I might've linked to this before]

[PIMCO whitepaper]

Just give up and hope for the best?… Don’t simply depend on popular canned US-centric advice to plan your own retirement.  Your decision requires the best data available for you

Why I go to Australia.A Lot. Institutional Investor
In sum, Australia seems to have found a successful recipe for retirement success that combines high savings rates at a low cost to government with professional investment management. In my view, it is the most interesting pension and investment place on earth today — more valuable as a role model than Canada or the Netherlands or the U.K. — and that’s why I’ve been spending so much time flying over the Pacific.



MARKETS AND INVESTING


We are so skewed! Earlyretirementnow.com
The problem is: negative skewness is where the juicy returns are. And positive skewness is where the sucker bets reside…  What’s the explanation? Say thanks to basic mathematics and statistics, in particular, the “Central Limit Theorem.” It states that the average outcome from independent draws from even very non-Normal distributions (e.g. very negatively skewed distributions) will look more and more “Normal” and thus unskewed.    [this is both why I sell options and why it is psychologically and behaviorally hard]

Given that security analysts are supposed to be sophisticated investors, and all the anomalies analyzed were in the publicly available literature, it is surprising to find that while analysts’ return forecasts predict stock returns, they do so in the wrong direction. It’s particularly puzzling given the finding from prior research that short sellers (typically thought of as sophisticated institutional investors, such as hedge funds) tend to target stocks in anomaly-short portfolios, and that this effect increases after a paper has been published. It’s also puzzling in light of the fact that Paul Calluzzo, Fabio Moneta and Selim Topaloglu, authors of the 2015 study “Institutional Trading and Anomalies,” found that institutions do follow anomaly strategies, although only after the anomaly is highlighted in an academic publication. 

Fractals themselves will not do anything for you, but understanding compound interest and how it behaves fractally can make you rich.

…the spending goal should drive the investment strategy. An investor can be relatively risk tolerant, but if their spending goal is not flexible (for example, medical spending or living expenses in retirement) then the investment portfolio should reflect the inflexibility of the future goal. And the investments selected today to meet that future goal should be those that offer the highest expected after-tax payout for the amount of spending flexibility an investor is willing to accept. In a 2012 article in the Journal of Financial Planning, Duncan Williams of the University of Georgia, Wade Pfau of The American College and I argued that spending flexibility is how we should define risk tolerance when matching a portfolio allocation to a future spending goal. If we can be more flexible with our spending goal, then we can take on more investment risk.

Investment entities, both people and institutions, often say one thing and mean another with respect to risk.  They can keep a straight face with respect to minor market gyrations.  But major market changes leading to the possible or actual questioning of whether they will have enough money to meet stated goals is what really matters to them. There are six factors that go into any true risk analysis (I will handle them in order):

Retiring in Japan1990. EREVN at medium.com
Last time I looked at the big crashes in US history and wondered how many people really would have pulled the trigger and retired right before or during the crash. [can't put my finger on it but I'm not 100% on board with the post yet.]


ALTERNATIVE RISK

the authors deny the idea that ARP constitutes a “passing fad.” These premia constitute a real solution for investors. But those investors “should choose which strategy to invest in with considerable care: in particular, different strategies with the same name cane provide very different return streams.” Investors should also pay heed to how the ARP portion of their portfolio is “designed and implemented, as a simplistic approach may lead to unwelcome surprises.” 

In this paper we look at the theory behind alternative risk premia before discussing some of the practical considerations that should help investors get the most out of their allocation to these innovative investment strategies.

Sometimes we feel there is nothing new when it comes to momentum. However, a new momentum investing paper, “Overpriced Winners,” by Profs Kent Daniel, Alexander Klos, and Simon Rottke, is really cool and worth consideration. One key chart from the paper sums up everything:

we also recognize that utilizing style premia in a multi-asset fashion can introduce complexities, that when unaddressed, can lead to unexpected (read: poor) performance.  Caveat emptor: understanding how a manager addresses these problems is critical for establishing long-term expectations.

The research numbers shows that trend-following is effective across all major market sectors and long time periods. The Sharpe ratios net of fees are all positive for every decade since the 1880's. Additionally diversification with equities is strong with correlation with stock indices ranging between -.34 and .33. Both short and long-term trend-following is effective but not necessarily at the same time. The research shows that long-term trend-following is not sensitive to a lagging or delay of the signals.


 SOCIETY AND CAPITAL

In an out-of-sample exercise, we use an asset-pricing model to simulate returns and we establish that observed portfolios imply that the share of total wealth held by the top 0.01% should grow on average by 4.5% per year on average if households simply capitalise their returns, a pace of increase that is comparable to recent US estimates. The projected increase in wealth inequality is almost entirely driven by the fact that the rich hold both more systematic risk (generating high returns) and more idiosyncratic risk (generating exploding fortunes at the top), and invest in highly levered private firms (generating returns with a fat right tail).  [ this in my mind is a relatively invisible source of income inequality pointed out by Piketty in 2014; it's not just that the wealthy can take more discretionary risk on the margin it's also that they have access to top tier managers and funds and return profiles that you and I don't due to things like high minimums, investor status, already closed funds they are already in, lockups etc. etc.  A retail investor can get access to some of the AQR funds in terms of some of the liquid alts but not so much to Rennaisance, David Tepper, PE funds, Cohen, Louis Bacon, etc.  Maybe via pension funds but that is another story altogether worthy of its own post someday. ]

The three volumes of Household Finance are organized thematically, affording the reader multiple perspectives on seminal issues in household finance and investing. These issues include asset allocation and location, risk aversion, stock trading behavior, underdiversification, financial literacy, financial advice, influences of culture and heredity on financial behavior, credit card behavior, and homeownership risk. Most of the pieces date from 2000 or later and thus address the increased number and complexity of financial decisions over the past 17 years. In addition, the writings consider household wealth from a global perspective…The $1,368 price tag puts this collection beyond the reach of most individual investors but well within a library’s budget. It is an invaluable reference for researchers, economists, students of behavioral finance, private wealth managers, product managers, and public policymakers. Most individuals will not have time to read all three volumes in their entirety, nor is it necessary to do so. Collectively, they are a reference work to be accessed for particular areas of interest. Best suited to an academic or technical readership, the individual contributions demand rigorous study, for in many instances they use quantitative methods and statistical analysis to support the authors’ hypotheses. 


A nation’s employment-to-population ratio can provide an indicator of the health of its labor markets—specifically, how much of the workforce participates in the formal economy. The map shows worldwide employment-to-population ratios in 2016, where lighter-colored countries have higher employment ratios. The data reflect the proportion of the working age population in various countries employed during the reference period.


It seems almost a bizarre question. Who thinks about whether zero was invented or discovered? And why is it important? …. Further contemplation might illuminate that the zero has something to teach us about existence as well. If we accept zero, the symbol, as being discovered as part of our realization about the existence of nothingness, then trying to understand the zero can teach us a lot about moving beyond the binary of alive/not alive to explore other ways of conceptualizing what it means to be. 

Do you know the true story of how a careless clerk, while burning up some outdated money, caused the Great Fire of 1834 which destroyed both Houses of the British Parliament, along with large portions of the Palace of Westminster? Tim Harford tells the tale in "What tally sticks tell us about how money works"




No comments:

Post a Comment