Feb 10, 2017

Weekend Links - Feb 10 2017

QUOTE OF THE DAY

Last year Morgan Housel observed that hedge funds outnumber Taco Bells (1.6:1). irrelevantinvestor 


CHART OF THE DAY

this should be handed out to all middle-schoolers 


RETIREMENT FINANCE AND PLANNING



Floor and Upside Investing in Retirement without Annuities, G. Irlam.  "I investigate optimal stock/bond asset allocation and consumption decisions using a utility function that is intended to be representative of a retired individual's need for an income floor and desire for upside potential. I do this without using annuities. Breaking with a common assumption that you should become more conservative if you have reached “your number,” the asset allocation to stocks increases if floor consumption is largely satisfied. I discover a bond heavy region that absorbs the impact of downside stock market shocks and protect the income floor. I also discover declining absolute bond holdings when downside risks are small. Careful tuning of the parameters of the aggregate utility function makes it possible to engineer the asset allocation/consumption strategy to meet the retired individual's specific income goals while keeping the consumption floor covered."

Retirement Income Showdown: Risk Pooling Versus Risk Premium, Wade Pfau in Journal of Financial Planning 30 (2): 40–51 2017. "The main advantage for the investments-only risk premium strategy was that it allowed for a larger legacy should the retiree die early, but at the cost of not having a contractual guarantee for income and with less true liquidity, as more had to be set aside to provide sufficient confidence that the spending goal could be funded. In the event of a long retirement, the legacy advantage of the risk premium strategy gradually declined as partial annuitization could ultimately support a larger legacy in the long term. These trade-offs suggest that greater care should be taken by advisers and retirees when considering how a client’s risk aversion and desires for legacy impact the relative advantages of risk pooling and the risk premium as strategies to fund retirement spending goals. It is not obvious that an investments-only retirement income strategy will outperform a partial annuitization strategy when seeking to meet various client retirement goals and managing retirement risk….Those favoring spending and true liquidity will find that it is much more difficult than commonly assumed for an investments-only strategy to outperform a strategy with partial annuitization."   [comment: for some reason, probably because of what I've been reading and studying lately, this feels like a near flawless cover of the retirement problem in its very essence. Hyperbolic maybe, but I think this is hitting on an awful lot of cylinders]

Busting the myth of ‘U-shaped’ retirement spending, UK finance site (finalytiq.co.uk). "for the majority of people, this idea of ‘U-shaped’ spending in retirement is but a myth…An ideal sustainable withdrawal strategy should follow the typical spending pattern in retirement." 

Five Ways to Increase Your Near-Term Spending, Part II, Ken Steiner.   Considering the growing volume of research showing declining real dollar spending in retirement, several retirement experts have suggested that individuals should consider developing their spending budgets so that they also decline in real terms throughout retirement. For example, Mr. Okusanya implies that, based on spending research in the U.S., it would be ideal to target inflation minus 1% (or more) for purposes of developing future spending budgets in the U.S.   

Drawing down Retirement Wealth: Interactions between SocialSecurity Wealth and Private Retirement Savings, Armour & Hung, Cornell/RAND.  …households that do delay claiming as the FRA rises also tend to delay retirement and drawing down their non-SS retirement assets, indicating complementarity between SS and non-SS decumulation decisions and strong spillovers from changes in both SS and private retirement policy. 

The Most Basic Missing Instrument in Financial Markets: TheCase for [a new type of bond] for Financial Security, ssrn.  This paper argues that governments globally can address the shortcomings by issuing a new type of bond that matches the needs of investors saving for retirement. This financial instrument is basically an inflation-linked bond that pays coupons when you need it. We call these Bonds for Financial Security (BFFS) and argue that this single instrument can help investors achieve retirement objectives at lower risk, lower cost, and with greater liquidity and greater simplicity than portfolios created through a mix of traditional stocks and bonds followed by annuity purchases.  

Adaptive Distribution Theory, Sandidge. Ssrn.  This paper reviews the changes in post-retirement risk and psychology that demand new approaches, offers a critique of existing retirement-income solutions, and presents an alternate model called “adaptive distribution theory.” Adaptive distribution theory for retirement-income portfolios redefines risk and captures investor psychology by incorporating key features of prospect theory. Risk and cash flow are addressed by managing the portfolio using acceptable annualized erosion rates and building a buffer of earnings. [ comment: Maybe a little wordy but I think this guy has a good bead on the problem and some of his answers are supported by research and theory he doesn't cite and may not even be aware of]

Optimal Decumulation Strategies During Retirement withDeferred Annuities. City University London.  Assuming a world where deferred annuities are available, we propose two utility maximising decumulation strategies comprising a deferred annuity purchased at retirement and optimal consumption and savings before the commencement of the annuity. A retiree who is concerned about longevity risk and wants to retain a certain level of liquidity is advised to spend 21.6% on a 15-year deferred annuity or 9.13% on a 20-year deferred annuity. A retiree who simply wants to use annuities to maximise overall satisfaction from retirement consumption is advised to spend 61.83% on a 6-year deferred annuity. We compare our strategies with other available decumulation strategies in the market, hence verifying the merits of the design. Moreover, the stability of our results are examined after allowing for consumption smoothness, social income benefits, a target replacement ratio and a bequest motive. 

Interpreting Monte Carlo Analyses and the Wrong Side of Maybe Fallacy, D Tharp at Kitces.com  …but the point is, the trend may actually be more important than a client’s position at any given time, and the trend can only be analyzed through ongoing planning. 



MARKETS AND INVESTING 


Everyone Is Still Learning, Morgan Housel.  Take retirement. Fifty years ago, the entire concept of retirement was reserved for the wealthy. The majority of men over age 65 were still in the labor force as recently as the 1950s. Most people worked until they died. Part of the reason individuals are notoriously bad investors is because the idea that everyone should invest their own money to fund 20+ years of retirement is a brand new concept. There’s been little generational knowledge transfer, and just a few bear markets since the mass expectation of retirement became a thing. Everyone is still learning how this works – which means we should be open to new concepts, learning techniques, and savings systems.   

How the Bogle Model Beats the Yale Model, Ben Carlson. I have to say that the numbers this year surprised me. I would expect the simple index fund portfolio to beat the average returns (that’s just math), but the fact that the Bogle Model portfolio was in the top quartile and even top decile of endowment returns is insane when you consider the depths these universities will go try to beat the market and how sophisticated they are in the eyes of other professional investors. These funds are invested in venture capital, private equity, infrastructure, private real estate, timber, the best hedge funds money can buy; they have access to the best stock and bond fund managers; they use leverage; they invest in complicated derivatives; they use the biggest and most connected consultants, and the vast majority of these funds still fail to beat a low-cost Vanguard index fund portfolio. 

Yield = Poison, Aleph Blog.  Make sure you have a margin of safety.  In a really large crisis, the return on risk assets may look decent from ten years before to ten years after, but a lot of people get surprised by their need to draw on those assets at the wrong moment — bad events come in bunches, when the credit cycle goes bust. Be careful, and don’t reach for yield. 

ETF links, Abnormal Returns.  


ALTERNATIVE RISK

Factor Investing Is More Art, And Less Science, alphaArchitect.com.  Let’s assume that the decibel level of Jim Cramer’s voice on CNBC is a proxy for systematic risk in the economy. 

“Alt-beta” funds offer hedge-fund-like investments morecheaply - But they complement rather than replace hedge funds, economist.com.  One reason is that the hedge funds’ mission—to provide returns uncorrelated with overall market performance—has been hard to replicate. 

Embracing Conflict in Asset Allocation, ThinkNewFound.  …no allocation approach has an equal ex ante probability of success across all market environments.  Evidence-based investment processes that are successful over the long-run can still go in and out of favor over extended periods of time. 

Factors are Not Commodities, investingresearch.net. The narrative of Smart Beta products is that factors are becoming an investment commodity. Factors are not commodities, but unique expressions of investment themes. One Value strategy can be very different from another, and can lead to very different results. There are many places that factor portfolios can differ. The difficulty for asset allocators is in identifying how factor strategies differ from one another, when they all purport to use the same themes: Value, Momentum and Quality. 



Smart Investing in an Environment of Low Expected Returns, Ilmanen. There’s been a lot of work on tail risks, and the most common way investors think about hedging tail risk may be through index put buying. However, when you look at historical data, this is roughly a minus-one Sharpe ratio strategy. There are some other candidate strategies, and one of my favorites is trend-following. Trend-following has a clear positive Sharpe ratio, and it has done well in most of the historical bear markets over the past one-hundred years.  My key message to investors when it comes to managing tail risk is to go for the cost effective way of buying tail protection [trend] rather than the expensive way [long put].  …let’s just talk about financial insurance through volatility selling strategies. I think this is a good source of long-run return; it’s the flip side of the expensiveness of buying index puts or some other volatility-buying strategy. Historically, investors have made good returns by selling volatility or, even more specifically, by selling puts.     [ I enjoyed this article/interview because of my particular interests.  Recommended ]


SOCIETY AND CAPITAL


The Universe in a Cup of Coffee, Scientific American. You think it's just a beverage, but it's a whole lot more  

A less mobile America, citylab.  "The Census reports that a record-low share of Americans are moving. A recent paper suggests government policies might be curbing mobility."  

US greener than Germany… sl-advisors.  



State-Run Retirement Plans: Are They a Viable Solution? Keith Clark, Advisor Perspectives.  



Bubbles are rarer than you think, Economist.com  Neither a doubling of the market nor a historically high valuation are reliable sell signals. Of course, that shouldn’t be too surprising. If timing the market were easy, big swings in prices would not happen in the first place. 



No comments:

Post a Comment