Feb 8, 2018

Weekend Links - 1/8/18

QUOTE OF THE DAY


The benchmark is “my family and I are alive, safe and fed”. The rest is luxury. Daniel Egan  




RETIREMENT FINANCE AND PLANNING

Farnam Street
If you are able to be nimble, able to assess the ever-changing environment and adapt quickly, you'll always carry the advantage over your opponent. 

In between these extremes, the decision can be more difficult. The best I can recommend is that you imagine that you are 85 and your upside portfolio balance just went to zero, a victim of sequence of returns risk. What is the least amount of income you could have remaining that would not make your life an economic misery? This is the floor level you wish to have. 

What's a Floor? Dirk Cotton
I begin with the goal of a floor portfolio that provides near-certain safety-net income and I try to fill it with assets that in combination mitigate inflation risk, capital market risk, and longevity risk to guarantee that I can survive improbable but worst-case outcomes. Because floors are expensive, I build mine as low as I think I could tolerate and then I structure the rest of my retirement plan to minimize my chances of rolling off the bed. 

Second Childhood  Jonathan Clements
As a gut check, I use the strategy I recommend to others: Occasionally, I will take my portfolio and assume the stock portion loses 35%, which is the typical decline during a bear market. I’ll then look at the resulting hit to my overall portfolio’s value and ask myself, “Would you be okay with that?” [yes, this is, in fact, the correct question to ask oneself] 

Our recent webinar on the topic of retirement income buckets, or time segmentation, was a big hit with many questions coming in. In the past I’ve tried to reply personally to as many of the questions as I could. But with travel this week, I became overwhelmed. Also, if one person asked a question, probably many people had the same question in mind. So I thought I’d instead provide a list of questions and answers for everyone to be able to read. Let’s get to it… 

in many United States counties, life expectancy is moving backwards these days. 
Original link here https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-018-5058-9

We set up a life-cycle model of human aging and longevity in which individuals discount the future hyperbolically and make time-consistent decisions. This allows us to disentangle the role of discounting from the time consistency issue.  We show that hyperbolically discounting individuals, under a reasonable normalization, invest more in their health than they would if they had a constant rate of time preference. Using a calibrated life-cycle model of human aging, we predict that the average U.S. American lives about 4 years longer with hyperbolic discounting than he would if he had applied a constant discount rate. The reason is that, under hyperbolic discounting, experiences in old age receive a relatively high weight in life time utility. In an extension we show that the introduction of health-dependent survival probability motivates an increasing discount rate for the elderly and, in the aggregate, a u-shaped pattern of the discount rate with respect to age. [the sharp-eyed will recall my suggestion that hyperbolic discounting might be a useful tweak to retirement PV analysis. I can't follow their math but I get the general point] 

From time to time, we receive comments from readers who wonder why the recommended assumed investment return/discount rate (currently 4% per annum, or 2% in excess of our recommended annual assumed inflation rate) used to determine one’s Actuarial Budget Benchmark (ABB) is so low.  


Flexibility through going back to work and pursuing a side hustle will certainly solve some of the problems of the 4% rule. But the side hustle flexibility is no panacea. A side hustle could potentially last so long, we might as well consider it a multi-decade-long extension of our corporate career… So, I have a bit of a dim view on this whole “flexibility” and “side hustle” mantra in early retirement. I’m glad I worked a few extra years beyond 25x spending and accumulated more assets to lower my effective withdrawal rate for my 2018 retirement! That last year before retirement in a nice cushy corporate career with a window office on the 39th floor: it lowered the chance of working as a greeter at Walmart at age 69. [see the next link for the analysis of working longer] 


The Power of Working Longer; Bronshtein, Scott, Shoven, Slavov
increasing retirement saving by one percentage point ten years before retirement has the same impact on the sustainable retirement standard of living as working a single month longer.  [contemplate that sentence for a minute]  


Don’t let money get in the way of a wonderful retirement. Your investments should be a relatively worry-free tailwind that ensures you never have to return to the salt mines again. 



MARKETS AND INVESTING

This raises a couple of important questions: 1) what is this theory of inflation? And; 2) does inflation (and therefore bond prices) display momentum? These are big questions  …the interesting thing about using charts to read the bond market tea leaves is that it implies that interest rates are primarily a momentum phenomenon. In other words, when interest rates break X% then there’s a probability that they will continue higher or lower. As I’ve noted before, momentum works in an equity market index fund for fundamental reasons – the fund is essentially a rules-based product that sells losers and buys winners thereby attaching itself to long-term growth in corporate profits. But should momentum work in the bond market? … There is no evidence to support such thinking. 

We find that expected corporate bond returns are related cross-sectionally to downside risk, credit risk, liquidity risk, and bond market risk…Our new factors rely on the unique features of corporate bonds that distinguish from stocks, hence have superior performance in explaining the cross-section of expected bond returns, than all established stock and bond market factor models. 

We show that diametrically opposite conclusions about stocks’ long-term risk follow from Bodie’s methodology. Bodie’s conclusion that stock’s risk increases monotonically with the investment horizon is incorrect. Conventional wisdom about stock’s long-term risk has not been refuted. 

Of course, the all stock portfolio is the one that most people will say they want to own here because the end result is better. But the all stock portfolio is also the one that exposes you to a lot more behavioral risk. And I know from decades of experience seeing people’s behavior in the markets that it’s the bear markets that do the most damage to people’s portfolios because that’s when they make all the big mistakes. In other words, portfolio 2 will generate a marginally worse result, but it’s the portfolio you’re likely to stay invested in when things go south. And that’s why you diversify even if you are worried that rates are going to rise. 

The Dutch East India Company was the first company to offer shares of stock. It famously paid a dividend that averaged around 18% of capital over the course of the company’s 200-year existence. 



ALTERNATIVE RISK

[Simulations] demonstrate that the payoff of the trend-following strategy is convex and is similar to a long exposure on a straddle option… Convex beta [with limited downside and unlimited upside] is precious and scarce. Among risk premia, momentum is one of the few strategies to offer this…asymmetry. 

Keep Up the Momentum, Thierry Roncalli
The answers can already be found in the technical paper "Understanding the Momentum Risk Premium" published recently by Jusselin et al. (2017). However, the underlying mathematics can be daunting to readers. Therefore, this discussion paper presents the key messages and the associated financial insights behind these results. 

Since it is considered a market anomaly, it is not always well understood. Many publications on this topic are therefore based on backtesting and empirical results. However, some academic studies have developed a theoretical framework that allows us to understand the behavior of such strategies. In this paper, we extend the model of Bruder and Gaussel (2011) to the multivariate case. 

Boosters of blockchain technology compare its early days to the early days of the Internet. But whereas the Internet quickly gave rise to email, the World Wide Web, and millions of commercial ventures, blockchain's only application – cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin – does not even fulfill its stated purpose. 

With low current rates and higher durations, the stage may be set for systematic, factor-based bond investing. 

Trend following has historically provided strong long-term returns with materially reduced drawdowns relative to a traditional buy and hold investment, but none of this matters if an investor cannot stick with the strategy through periods of relative underperformance. This “opportunity cost” is often felt the most during periods when more traditional allocations outperform.  

There are so many different factor products available that just about every fund company seems to offer them…even Vanguard is launching their own suite of factor-based stock funds. Note that nearly all of these products are focused on stocks…not bonds. Why the lack of factor love for fixed income instruments? 

One result of competitively marketing quantitative techniques to investors is that technical literacy has declined. In particular, the word "factor" is now so ambiguous that it is almost meaningless. 

Do Not Follow The System, priceactionlab
Many academics, instead of dealing with the difficult problem of changes in market conditions, or regime switches, concentrate on the easy but even wrong problem of over-fitting. They have succeeded in shifting the attention of many traders and even professionals to that often at a huge opportunity cost but they have secured positions and tenure in the meantime. 


Research Affiliates recently advised that “momentum can be divided into fresh and stale momentum, with very different results.”  In other words, trending behavior has a life cycle, which implies that hopping on the bandwagon in the later stages of a momentum rally carries more risk than establishing new positions relatively early. Quantifying where we are at any given point for a momentum trade, however, is open to debate, but we can start by calculating some basic statistics as a benchmark.  … The current momentum rally, approaching its second birthday, may not be stale just yet, but it’s far from fresh. There may be some kick left in this horse, but a sensible interpretation of the data suggests that the easy money has been made. 


SOCIETY AND CAPITAL

The small island nation of Mauritius is one of Africa’s brightest success stories, with a 195% growth in wealth over the last 10 years. With favorable tax policies, beautiful beaches, and better relative safety ratings, HNWIs have been moving to the island en masse.  

what they came up with was arguably the least fun 20-item questionnaire in history. 

Two Nobelists in economics, George Akerlof and Robert Shiller, argue in their book “Phishing for Phools” that all of these results of capitalist competition should have been central to economic theory in the first place. In my review[i] of their book, I described their argument as “the exact same free-market process that Adam Smith lauded for doing a great job of satisfying mutual self-interests, also incentivizes scamming. It is not possible to separate the two; they must be part and parcel of the same economic theory.”

What if we made landowners pay for infrastructure and urban improvements? After all, under a recent proposal from Governor Andrew Cuomo, New York may do just that to fund subway extensions. Property taxes would go up for New York City landowners within a certain distance from train lines, perhaps up to 1 mile. Land value capture, as it’s called, has also surfaced as a means of paying for President Donald Trump’s proposed infrastructure improvements. 

Commit to a process, not a goal…Goals are strangely at odds with long-term progress…Goals suggest that you can control things that you have no control over.  


No comments:

Post a Comment