Oct 5, 2017

Weekend Links - 10/5/2017

QUOTE OF THE WEEK

"Everything simple is false. Everything which is complex is unusable."[1]  Paul Valéry 



GRAPHIC OF THE WEEK 


http://conversableeconomist.blogspot.com/2017/09/interview-with-lawrence-katz-inequality.html


RETIREMENT FINANCE AND PLANNING

The reason why most Americans are able to retire by 66 despite so little wealth is due to Social Security, a traditional pension, and retirement work plans. LIMRA reports that some 41% of retirees have annual income less than $25,000. Of retirees with income over $50,000 a year, about 80% draw from a pension or retirement plan… Unfortunately, virtually nobody under 40 is going to have a traditional pension any more.  

The cycles over the last 40 years have reflected developments in medical drugs and technology, access to health care, and risky behaviors such as smoking and those associated with obesity. The gains in mortality improvement have been skewed toward those with higher educational attainment and more income...The key debate is whether the future will mirror the past, with average rates of improvement of about 1 percent, or whether the pace of progress will slow. 

Better Budgeting with the IRS RMD Table? Ken Steiner
while the IRS RMD SWP may be a tad simpler than the Actuarial Approach, we believe that doing the more exact actuarial calculations is definitely worthwhile and can improve retirement outcomes even more.  This is why our website tagline reads, “The spending budget website for intelligent retirees and pre-retirees (and their financial advisors) who aren't afraid to do a little number crunching to get the right answer.”  The following paragraphs discuss why we believe you or your financial advisor may be making a mistake using the “simpler” IRS RMD SWP advocated by Mr. Tomlinson to determine your spending budget in retirement or to determine when you should retire or how much you should be saving for retirement.    


MARKETS AND INVESTING

A new research paper applies complexity theory to changes in euro area fixed income markets that arose from non-conventional policy. It finds that quantitative indicators heralded critical structural shifts in unsecured money markets and high-grade bond markets. 

Surviorship bias, Ben Carlson
If any of these 110 people worked in the investment business they probably would have started their own newsletter — My Secret Formula for Winning the Lottery. … most people are better off learning how to get their personal finances in order and investing in themselves than trying to find home run investments that will change their lives. 

you have to think in terms of total returns to understand the relationship between bond performance and interest rates. 


The Frustrating Law of Active Management. Corey Hoffstein - Newfound
…for a strategy to outperform in the long run, it has to be hard enough to stick with in the short run that it causes investors to “fold,” passing the alpha to those with the fortitude to “hold.” In other words, for a strategy to outperform in the long run, it must underperform in the short run.  

I think the reason the myth is popular among economists insulated from markets is that they assume anything that reduces leverage, even a bubble, reduces risk. This is one reason regulators seek risk in the wrong places: They look where prices have fallen and apparent leverage is high; while the risk is mostly where prices have risen and apparent leverage is low. 

We argue that investors are better off using the implied cost of capital based on analysts' earnings forecasts as a forward-looking return estimate. Correcting for predictable analyst forecast errors, we demonstrate that mean-variance optimized portfolios based on these estimates outperform on both an absolute and a risk-adjusted basis the minimum volatility portfolio as well as naive benchmarks, such as the value-weighted and equally-weighted market portfolio. The results continue to hold when extending the sample to international markets, using different methods for estimating the forward-looking return, including transaction costs, and using different optimization constraints. 



ALTERNATIVE RISK

Nonetheless, instead of comparing performance or value-added to a stock index, the relevant benchmark should be a stock-bond blend. This is a higher hurdle for hedge fund value-added, but is more realistic because investors are already starting with a diversified portfolio. Hedge fund relevance is based on the marginal contribution to an existing portfolio not against a single asset class.  [of course it is; this is how I've benchmarked alt since ~2005]  

it’s always better to be the uniquely informed investor. We don’t pretend otherwise. But unique is also much harder to evaluate (skill versus luck, real versus data mining versus lucky good draw) and much harder to find and invest in scale. Known strategies have the advantage of, well, you know about them! And they are often available in scale. If the known strategies make sense to you, if they have a great body of in- and out-of-sample evidence behind them, and if they pass some basic intuitive tests of whether they’ve been arbitraged away or not, then it makes no sense to ignore them. Don’t be blasé about the potential problems that might come with extreme crowding into these strategies, but also don’t assume that once something is known it’s gone forever from that day onward, and thus ignore good diversifying strategies that we believe will be with us for quite a while — and are needed now more than ever! 

However, among the many alternatives from which to choose, there are really only a few you should contemplate. They …Are supported by the academic literature, meaning they have provided premiums that have been both persistent and pervasive, come with intuitive risk-based or behavioral-based explanations, and survive implementation costs.
Can be implemented using products under SEC regulation. Tend to have low correlation with the returns of traditional portfolio assets. May not necessarily be cheap by index fund or ETF standards, but don’t come with the typical “2-and-20” hedge fund fees. 

Recent research has studied the impact of asymmetry on cost of capital estimation, performance evaluation, and optimal portfolio composition. This study examines the impact of skewness preference on the risk premium of a gamble. The three-moment analogue of the Pratt-Arrow risk premium is derived for asymmetric gambles that are not necessarily actuarially neutral. It is seen that the standard Pratt-Arrow risk premium is biased down (up) for an actuarially neutral gamble that has positive (negative) skew. [I won't pretend that I understand the paper but this is a type of confirmation of a behavioral bias towards positive skews, gambling and lotteries.  Since casinos and insurance companies make money taking the other side, this is also confirmation of the potential for positive risk premia in selling options/volatility where there is a different type of skew, which I have been known to do. This tags along well with the previous link] 

We believe that this is one of the chief reasons for holding global macro and managed futures. Managed futures will provide for better downside protection during those times when the market is in turmoil and there is a chance for a large market decline. The manager can switch exposures quickly through trading futures both long and short. 

Alternative Risk Premia: Is the Selection Process Important? Naya, Haute école de gestion (HEG) de Fribourg
To summarize, this research paper shows that investors need to take no short cuts. When it comes to allocate capital to ARP, an extensive due diligence process is required to select both the indices and their providers. 


SOCIETY AND CAPITAL

On Productivity, Morgan Housel
…we underestimate our potential when we only view productivity through the lens of creating new inventions, ignoring how much unnecessary productivity-sapping social nonsense we put up with, but shouldn’t. 



Incentives, Farnamstreet
You do not want to be in a perverse incentive system that’s causing you to behave more and more foolishly or worse and worse — incentives are too powerful a control over human cognition or human behavior. If you’re in one [of these systems], I don’t have a solution for you. You’ll have to figure it out for yourself, but it’s a significant problem. 

Katz (together with co-author Claudia Goldin) have argued that the most important reason behind rising wage inequality is that in the race between rising demand for skilled labor and rising supply of skilled labor, demand has surged ahead. The implication is that the appropriate long-run response to address inequality would be to aim at a dramatic increase in the share of Americans receiving higher education. However, others have emphasized other issues that might relate to the role of inequality, like effects from increased international competition, or have pointed out that the rising incomes of top corporate executives doesn't seem to have an obvious link to a shortage of skilled college-educated workers. In this interview, Katz argues that rising demand for skilled labor remains the primary cause of greater wage inequality, and that a substantial increase in the share of Americans receiving quality higher education from the public sector is the appropriate answer.  


But tons of savings, in the eyes of those who saved it, represents tons of hard work – from you, or someone who left it for you. You worked your ass off for it. So of course you’re paranoid about losing it. And of course it’s a treadmill, because savings often only scales when you sacrifice more. This also explains why people who didn’t work hard for their money – lottery winners, for example – often go broke. They have no sweat equity in their bank account… the dream perpetually feels better than the accomplishment. 

Investing is the grand equalizer of the world. It does not care about your gender, race, religion, sexual orientation, or any other aspect of your identity. Market returns do not discriminate. Gains and losses are shared without prejudice. And, no matter how smart you are, you cannot outsmart the market consistently. This fact is humbling and showcases the incredible power of the market. It is amazing to me how the market acts more like a biological system than almost anything humans have ever created. The market has fractal properties and it’s always evolving. Morgan Housel calls it the unsolvable puzzle. 

This paper reviews a range of studies of the adequacy of household saving, comparing estimated dollar savings shortfalls with unfunded liabilities in Social Security, in federal employee and uniformed military pensions, and in state and local government retirement plans. Even the most pessimistic forecasts of household undersaving fall short of the most optimistic estimates of government retirement plan underfunding. It appears that, on average, households are doing at least as well in saving for retirement as governments are in funding retirement plans on households’ behalf. 

Global Warming Asset Pricing, Tirodkar, U Aukland
I find no evidence for the existence of a cross-sectional temperature risk premium. Furthermore, industry temperature betas do not predict outcomes of the 2015 Paris Agreement, and firm temperature betas do not correlate with self-disclosed exposures to environmental risk. Trading strategies also reveal that a long-short temperature portfolio does not generate significantly negative abnormal returns. Results provide no evidence of priced temperature risk in U.S. markets. I attribute the lack of results to the long time horizons of climate change induced disasters and investor diversification options. 


----------------
[1] A former CEO of FICO once told me that there is a simplicity on the far side of complexity.  A narrow application of the quote at the top of the page to the CEO's comment might imply then that on the far side of complexity is still falseness.  But, I'm guessing he meant that on this side simple is false and while complexity might be unusable on the far side is something that is somewhere in the simple-true-usable mix. 









No comments:

Post a Comment