"The optimal strategy might be executing a suboptimal plan at a fast pace. Strategy evolves as lessons are learned—and the person who moves faster, learns faster. Learning is a marathon and perfection is a weighted vest. - James Clear
“It is better to be roughly right than precisely wrong.“ — Carveth Read*
10 years ago I believed, more than I do now, in the grace of specific numbers and precision. Today, not so much. That's because even if I were to have a perfect, optimal retirement model, and if I had successfully tuned it to the infinity of possibilities of whatever reality we know, as of yesterday let's say, then: 1) you and I would still have results different enough today that it would be hard to explain, and 2) for both of us, the output today could be entirely stale as early as tomorrow morning. Agony, right? I used to think so. Instead, I have been thinking how it matters only generally what we spend and how we invest but not necessarily specifically or precisely. Getting into a "close enough zone" and being willing to adapt are stronger and less burdensome concepts than getting it exactly right. At least I am telling myself that so I don't pull out what's left of my hair.